Korean J Women Health Nurs Search

CLOSE


Korean J Women Health Nurs > Volume 20(4); 2014 > Article
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing 2014;20(4):287-296.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2014.20.4.287    Published online December 31, 2014.
Analysis of Reports on Observational Studies Published in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing based on the STROBE Guideline
Sue Kim, Hyun Ei Oh, Ju Eun Song, Myounghee Kim, Sukhee Ahn, Eun Joo Lee, Eun Mi Jun, Sukhee Cheon
1College of Nursing, Nursing Policy Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Nursing, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
3College of Nursing, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea. songje@ajou.ac.kr
4Department of Nursing, Semyung University, Jecheon, Korea.
5College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
6College of Nursing, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
7Department of Nursing, Dong-Eui University, Busan, Korea.
8Department of Nursing, Sangji University, Wonju, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of reports on observational studies published in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN).
METHODS
Forty-six studies using cross-sectional designs published in KJWHN from January 2011 to June 2013 were selected for analysis. Selected articles were reviewed and evaluated by three reviewers using the 22 items of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. As some of 22 items had more than one check point, further broken down, 34 checklist items were used for analysis.
RESULTS
Overall, the reviewed studies provided sufficient descriptions for many STROBE items. Seven of the 34 items were found to be not applicable, and 15 of the remaining 27 items (55.5%) were evaluated as 'sufficient' in reporting. Only one study included a flow diagram illustrating participation and this lack of flow diagram was the weakest area of reporting in this review.
CONCLUSION
Clearer reporting of cross-sectional studies can be attained by attention to vulnerable areas of reporting, such as including a flow diagram of participants, descriptions of sources of bias and reason for non-participation, and describing limitations of the study. Issues regarding the application of STROBE statement items should be actively discussed in order to aid future revision and clarification of items included in STROBE statement.
Key Words: Cross-sectional design; Quality of reporting; Guideline; STROBE


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
CURRENT ISSUE
FOR AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS
Editorial Office
College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2228-3276    Fax: +82-2-2227-8303    E-mail: kjwhn2020@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2021 by Korean Society of Women Health Nursing. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next